CATFISHING & FRAUD · REAL STORY

Thomas Godden: the romance that came with a repayment promise

The money was supposedly temporary help with everyday expenses. Repayment would come later. But when the men asked for it, Thomas Godden threatened the relationships they believed they had built.

Sources: Crown Prosecution Service — Prosecution and sentencing account

Read the story ↓
The case at a glance

Key details

Contact
Tinder and Bumble; three men lost more than £28,000 between them.
Outcome
a guilty plea and three years in prison. Official announcements appeared in March 2026, although their sentencing dates conflict.

Sources: City of London Police — Investigation and sentencing account · Crown Prosecution Service — Prosecution and sentencing account

Based on the dated reporting and records linked below.

The timeline

  1. July 2022

    the documented offending began. [2]

  2. December 15, 2025

    guilty pleas to three fraud counts at Canterbury Crown Court. [1]

  3. March 17–18, 2026

    prosecutors and police published their sentencing accounts. These are publication dates, not an agreed sentencing date. [1]

A loan request inside a relationship

Prosecutors described repeated transfers for living costs, backed by promises Godden never intended to honour. He also arranged meetings with one man, then left him stranded after a long journey. The financial requests were embedded in an apparent personal commitment.

The pressure extended to reporting the conduct. According to prosecutors, Godden told one victim police would not take him seriously. One man lost more than £26,000 and accumulated substantial debt. Two others obtained bank reimbursement.

Sources: Crown Prosecution Service — Prosecution and sentencing account · City of London Police — Investigation and sentencing account

What investigators could check

Victims did report what had happened. Their reports reached the City of London Police fraud team. Investigators recovered messages and internet searches that, police said, exposed Godden's financial purpose in using the apps. His searches included questions about criminal consequences for romance scams and whether unpaid money could be reported to police.

Our reading is that the repayment promise served two purposes: it explained the immediate request and gave the recipient a reason to keep waiting. The relevant evidence went beyond whether a profile looked convincing. It included the requests, the transfers and the response when someone asked for their money back.

Sources: City of London Police — Investigation and sentencing account

Understanding the outcome

The sources agree on the prison term but differ on its precise date and the exact loss total. This account therefore uses the common, supported figure of more than £28,000.

For questions about a profile's claims, read what a phone lookup can tell you and how to check a dating profile photo. Those checks cannot establish someone's intentions or a promise to repay. Responsibility for this deception rests with the offender.

Sources & reporting dates

  1. Crown Prosecution Service — Prosecution and sentencing account

    March 17, 2026

  2. City of London Police — Investigation and sentencing account

    March 18, 2026

  3. The Standard, Benjamin Lynch — Contemporaneous reporting

    March 18, 2026

Explore the checks

Learn what phone and photo searches can return, and how to interpret the findings.